BLOG

The History of 1031 Exchanges 

Gain a better understanding of the history of 1031 Exchanges and its evolution since becoming part of the Tax Code over 100 years ago. This blog covers major decisions and legislative milestones regarding Section 1031 and how like-kind exchanges have evolved into their current state. 
History of 1031 Exchanges 

Like-Kind Exchange first entered the United States Tax Code in 1921 shortly after the first income tax laws were issued in 1918. Since 1921, the statute has evolved into the tax deferral strategy we know today. We will look into key developments including the 1984 Tax Reform Act, which established the 45 and 180-day deadlines, and the landmark 1979 Starker decision that permitted delayed exchanges, as well as the 1991 Regulations, which introduced the role of the Qualified A person acting to facilitate an exchange under section 1031 and the regulations. This person may not be the taxpayer or a disqualified person. Section 1.1031(k)-1(g)(4)(iii) requires that, for an intermediary to be a qualified intermediary, the intermediary must enter into a written "exchange" agreement with the taxpayer and, as required by the exchange agreement, acquire the relinquished property from the taxpayer, transfer the relinquished property, acquire the replacement property, and transfer the replacement property to the taxpayer. Intermediary , amongst other safe harbors. More recent legislation that affected 1031 exchanges, includes the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act which limited exchanges to real property and the 2020 Regulations that better defined real property.  

 

1918: First Income Tax Law 

Before there could be an avenue for tax deferral, there first had to be associated taxes owed. The first income tax law was created in 1918, under the Revenue Act of 1918, which introduced the first codified income tax-rate structure in the United States with Normal Tax and Surtax. It was enacted during World War I in an effort to raise funds for the war effort. The Act did not provide for any type of tax-deferred like-kind exchange structure.  

1921: IRC Section 202 Gain or Loss not Recognized on Exchanges of Like-Kind Property  

The Revenue Act of 1921, also known as the Esch-Cummins Act, was a pivotal development in the evolution of tax-deferred exchanges. Its provisions allowed investors to exchange securities and non-like-kind property used in trade or business (unless the property acquired had a "readily realizable market value”) without immediately recognizing capital gains or losses. This attractive provision interested many real estate investors and laid groundwork for future legislation. 

A key part of the Act was Section 202, which outlined rules for tax-deferred exchanges. This Section required that exchanged properties must be of similar use to avoid investors from bypassing immediate taxation by exchanging a real estate asset for a non-real estate asset. This requirement ensured the integrity of the tax-deferred exchange process and prevented abuse of the tax system. The rationale for the Act was that if parties traded properties and no cash was exchanged between them, then there wasn’t an event to assess a tax. It is indicated by congressional notes that the “continuity of an investment” should not result in a taxable event. 

1954: Code Section Changed to Section 1031 

The 1954 Amendment to the Federal Tax Code changed Section 112(b)(1), previously Section 202 until renumbered with The Revenue Act of 1928, to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, providing today’s widely used term Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 states that "no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment." 1031 Exchange . The main takeaway of the amendment is that it adopted a stronger definition and description of a tax-deferred like-kind exchange and laid the foundation for the structure of like-kind real estate exchanges that are employed today.  

1979: Starker Decision: 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals 

Prior to 1979 and the Starker decision, it was believed that 1031 exchanges had to be simultaneous, meaning at the same time the (“Exchangor” or “Taxpayer”) Person intending to conduct a 1031 tax deferred exchange, who transfers a relinquished property and thereafter receives a replacement property. Exchanger sold their property, they were purchasing their new property. There was not a delay in the “exchange” of the two properties. In the case of TJ Starker v. United States, Starker and Crown Zellerbach Corporation exchanged timber property for “like-kind” property that was not immediately identified nor acquired. Crown Zellerbach had guaranteed that they would convey the Replacement Property within five years. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in this case that (“Exchangor” or “Taxpayer”) Person intending to conduct a 1031 tax deferred exchange, who transfers a relinquished property and thereafter receives a replacement property. Exchanger s should still be covered by Section 1031 even if there is a delay in the closing of the Those certain items of real and/or personal property qualifying as “replacement property” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.1031(k)‑1(a) and either: (a) received by the taxpayer within the designation period in accordance with Treasury Regulations Section 1.1031(k)‑1(c)(1) or (b) identified in a written designation notice signed by the taxpayer and hand delivered, mailed, telecopied or otherwise sent to the qualified intermediary before the end of the designation period in accordance with Treasury Regulations Sections 1.1031(k)‑1(b) and (c). The definition of “replacement property” shall not include property the identification of which has been revoked by the taxpayer in accordance with Treasury Regulations Section 1.1031(k)‑1(c)(6); (“New Asset”) Property or properties properly received by a taxpayer as part of a 1031 exchange. Replacement Property . Prior to the decision, it was generally understood that it was an implicit requirement of a 1031 exchange that the transfers of property be simultaneous.   

The Starker case introduced and approved the concept of delayed exchanges. 

The five-year time frame involved in the decision was very open ended and as a result, the U.S. Treasury petitioned Congress to amend Section 1031 by adding time limits to the process. 

1984: 45 and 180-Day Restrictions  

The Tax Reform Act of 1984 introduced IRC § 1031(a)(3) to add time restrictions on non-simultaneous exchanges. The Act further defined what “like-kind” property was and established a concrete timeline for Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 states that "no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment." 1031 Exchange s. 

The 45-day identification period stipulates that an (“Exchangor” or “Taxpayer”) Person intending to conduct a 1031 tax deferred exchange, who transfers a relinquished property and thereafter receives a replacement property. Exchanger has 45 days after the date of the sale of the Relinquished Property to identify the potential Replacement Property(ies) the (“Exchangor” or “Taxpayer”) Person intending to conduct a 1031 tax deferred exchange, who transfers a relinquished property and thereafter receives a replacement property. Exchanger intend to acquire. The 180-day exchange period (or less depending on the due date for filing the tax return for the year of the sale) marks the total time the (“Exchangor” or “Taxpayer”) Person intending to conduct a 1031 tax deferred exchange, who transfers a relinquished property and thereafter receives a replacement property. Exchanger has to complete the acquisition of the Replacement Property(ies).  

1991: Deferred Exchange Regulations Treas. Reg. § 1.1031 Issued 

The final regulations on deferred exchanges proposed by The Treasury Department resolve deferral, constructive receipt, agency, and many other technical requirements which require careful attention to detail. The regulations introduced safe harbors to solve for problems previously experienced in the Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 states that "no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment." 1031 Exchange process and helped make it easier to accomplish a successful exchange by following these safe harbors.  

The safe harbors include: 

1997: Taxpayer Relief Act: Distinction Between Foreign and Domestic Property

The (“Exchangor" or "Exchanger") Individual or entity desiring an exchange. Taxpayer Relief Act (TRA) of 1997 aimed to boost economic growth by reducing taxes for businesses and individuals through tax rate cuts, capital gains tax relief, and incentivizing investment in several sectors, including real estate. Before TRA, high capital gains tax rates discouraged foreign investment in US real estate. The TRA lowered the maximum capital gains tax rate from 28% to 20%, making US real estate more appealing to international investors. 

The TRA also introduced the Foreign Investment in The land, and everything that is permanently attached to the land, and all of the rights of ownership of that property. Real property is typically classified according to its general use as either residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, or special purpose. Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). FIRPTA simplified tax withholding requirements for foreign sellers of US real estate. These changes made it easier for international investors to navigate the regulatory landscape and facilitated their investments in the sector. 

Additionally, The TRA implemented measures to further encourage foreign investment, such as the creation of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). REITs allow foreign investors to invest in US real estate through publicly traded entities, offering benefits like diversification, professional management, and liquidity. This structure enabled foreign investors to gain exposure to the US real estate market without directly owning and managing properties. 

2000: Rev. Proc. 2000-37 Introduces “Parking” Exchanges  

Rev. Proc. 2000-37 published by the IRS provides a safe harbor for “parking” exchanges, which includes Reverse Exchange and Build-to-Suit/ This refers to a type of exchange done where some of the proceeds of the sale of the relinquished property will be used to cause improvements to be added to the improvements already on the replacement property so that the taxpayer can complete the trade where both the value of the land and of the enhanced improvements will count for the amount the taxpayer traded for. For example a taxpayer may put in new heating, ventilating, air conditioning, roof and windows on the property. These types of exchanges are structured pursuant to IRS Rev. Proc. 2000-37 and are sometimes known as “property parking exchanges” and require the exchange facilitator to take on an additional role as a Qualified Exchange Accommodation Titleholder. Improvement Exchange s. A Reverse Exchange is when the Replacement Property is acquired prior to the Relinquished Property being sold. 

The A safe harbor generally refers to a fact situation where under traditional tax or legal principles the proposed transaction, or part of a transaction, would be prohibited. If an otherwise prohibited transaction can be structured pursuant to an IRS promulgated safe harbor, the IRS agrees not to challenge the structure as to form. Safe Harbor within Rev. Proc. 2000-37 reads: 

 “The qualification of property as either replacement property or relinquished property for purposes of 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder, or the treatment of the Also referred to as an "EAT", is typically a special purpose, limited-liability company that is used to own the legal title to property that is being parked as part of a reverse exchange. An exchange accommodation titleholder may not be a disqualified person. Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (EAT) as the beneficial owner of the replacement property or relinquished property for federal income tax purposes, if the property is held in a Qualified Exchange Accommodation Arrangement (QEAA), as defined in the revenue procedure.” 

Under Rev. Proc. 2000-37, exchanges are accomplished by "parking" either the Replacement or Relinquished Property with a third party until the actual exchange of properties can take place. In this situation, a client would locate a third party, usually an exchange company, to act as an EAT. The client then assigns the contract for the Replacement Property to the EAT (though a lesser used procedure sometimes they transfer the Relinquished Property to the EAT). Using taxpayer or lender advanced funds, or a combination of the two, the EAT then acquires title to the Replacement Property and holds title until the client is able to sell the Relinquished Property. The contract for the Relinquished Property sale would then be assigned to a Qualified A person acting to facilitate an exchange under section 1031 and the regulations. This person may not be the taxpayer or a disqualified person. Section 1.1031(k)-1(g)(4)(iii) requires that, for an intermediary to be a qualified intermediary, the intermediary must enter into a written "exchange" agreement with the taxpayer and, as required by the exchange agreement, acquire the relinquished property from the taxpayer, transfer the relinquished property, acquire the replacement property, and transfer the replacement property to the taxpayer. Intermediary (QI) who would transfer it to the buyer as part of a conventional 1031 exchange process. The QI applies the sale proceeds to acquire the Replacement Property from the EAT and those funds are used to repay the acquisition financing from the client and/or lender and as the last step transfers the Replacement Property to the client to complete the exchange.  

With the introduction of the EAT taking title to the “parked” property, the Exchanger is considered to have sold the Relinquished Property prior to acquiring the Replacement Property. Without that proper sequence, a Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 states that "no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment." 1031 Exchange would not pass muster.    

2017: Tax Cut and Jobs Act Limits 1031 to Real Property Only 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 amended Section 1031 to only apply to exchanges of “real property”. Real property includes land, developed real estate, and other interests in real estate. The main takeaway is that personal property and certain intangible property exchanges, which were previously approved for tax deferral, were no longer covered under Section 1031, leaving only real estate capable of an exchange.  

2020: Expanded 1031 Regulations Further Defining Real Property 

The IRS issued the final regulations defining real property for Section 1031 purposes in November 2020. Under Regs. Sec. 1.1031(a)-3(a)(1), the definition of real property includes, “land and improvements to land, unsevered natural products of land, and water and air space superjacent to land."   

The regulations are complicated, but an example is provided where if a gas line going into a building is for heating purposes, it can be considered real property, but if it is used for something that is not part of the structural components of the building, such as cooking equipment, the gas line remains personal property. 

These final regulations provided that state or local law determines the classification of a property as real property for Section 1031 purposes and provided additional guidance with regard to certain items affixed to the real estate.  

The final regulations considered improvements to land to be considered real property under Section 1031 if they are classified as such by state/local law or are permanently affixed, the regulations provided a long list of examples.  

2023: Pennsylvania as the Last State to Recognize Section 1031 for State Tax Purposes Through PA H.B. 1342  

In July 2022, the Pennsylvania Legislature passed H.B. 1342, which provided extensive tax reform legislation. Before the introduction of this bill, Pennsylvania had been the only state that did not recognize Section 1031 for state personal income tax purposes. In Section 1031 exchanges before 2023, exchangers could defer capital gains taxes on the federal level, but not on PA state income taxes. The bill includes a provision that made Pennsylvania Personal Income Tax (PIT) observe federal income tax law, which includes the deferral of capital gains taxes under Section 1031. The bill enacted these changes to become effective December 31st of 2022, allowing for the recognition of Section 1031 tax deferral for all exchanges that started on or after January 1, 2023.  

 

The history of Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 states that "no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment." 1031 Exchange s displays a vast evolution in tax policy and real estate investment strategies over the past century. From inception of like-kind exchanges in 1921 to its current state, property owners have been utilizing this powerful tax deferral strategy to reinvest into the US economy. Provisions such as the introduction of the role of a Qualified Intermediary and the limitation of exchanges to real property have played pivotal roles in the modern definition of Section 1031. Together, Accruit and colleagues across the Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 states that "no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment." 1031 Exchange and real estate industry look forward to continuing to support and protect Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 states that "no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment." 1031 Exchange s in their current state.  

 

 

The material in this blog is presented for informational purposes only. The information presented is not investment, legal, tax or compliance advice. Accruit performs the duties of a Qualified A person acting to facilitate an exchange under section 1031 and the regulations. This person may not be the taxpayer or a disqualified person. Section 1.1031(k)-1(g)(4)(iii) requires that, for an intermediary to be a qualified intermediary, the intermediary must enter into a written "exchange" agreement with the taxpayer and, as required by the exchange agreement, acquire the relinquished property from the taxpayer, transfer the relinquished property, acquire the replacement property, and transfer the replacement property to the taxpayer. Intermediary , and as such does not offer or sell investments or provide investment, legal, or tax advice.